Winter Reading: Queer-Friendly Science Fiction

December 20th, 2017

I know I usually write about non-Yuri stuff on Sundays, but I’ve read a pile of great science fiction recently that I wanted to share with you before the holiday season slams down on all of us and I spend my days slaving over end-of-year lists.

To start things off, I highly recommend the Imperial Radch series by Ann Leckie. The Sad/Rabid Puppies hated this series with the burning of thousand fiery dyspeptic stomachs, which was good enough for me to give it a try. ^_^ I’ll do my best to no-spoiler synopsize the books, but no promises.

The series, which consists of three books –  Ancillary Justice, Ancillary Sword and Ancillary Mercy – follows an artificial intelligence that runs a troopship, Justice of Toren. The timeline of the first novel is split as Justice of Toren tells us of her experiences before and after a massively traumatic experience forces her to involve herself in the personal politics of the rule of the Imperium. The language of the Empire is non-gendered, and Justice of Toren is herself not really all that keyed into understanding gender, she she defaults to calling everyone “she.” (And for the moment, so will I.) This enraged the Puppies, as did some implied and actual homosexuality. It’s true that the different perspective on gendered language makes the book difficult for some folks, but of itself not enough to call the series good. That said, the story is not good – it’s brilliant. Characters, writing, world-building are all impeccably tight and extremely well-constructed. Leckie’s ability to create a society based around the principles of the Roman Empire that feel fresh and also very human, and her ability to create characters that are not at all human in stark contrast is astounding.

I have literally one complaint about this series and it has nothing to do with the series itself, but entirely is about my own needs as a reader. We – unfortunately, IMHO – do learn the sex of several of the main characters, when gendered language is used. I felt that to be a bit of a betrayal of the core concept. Other than that one thing, I found the entire series to be compelling reading. I’ve got Leckie’s next book, Provenance on my to-read list.

My next book of interest was Martha Wells’, All Systems Red: The Murderbot Diaries. This follows an artificial intelligence security bot, who refers to itself as “Murderbot” assigned to protect a scientific expedition. When it appears that they are being sabotaged, Murderbot teams up with it’s humans (despite it being generally uninterested and incapable of dealing with humans all that well) to find out what the heck is going on. 

Based on the size of this book and it’s font, I assumed it was an YA novel. I certainly could have read it easily in one sitting had I had the time. Even so it only took me two evenings to finish it. It was amusing, rather than compelling. I found myself fascinated by the behaviors of the protagonist who, despite calling itself Murderbot, seemed a peaceable enough being. There is also homosexuality in the story and gender and sexuality are topics that are covered within the story. Murderbot was, like Breq in the Imperial Radch series, not interested in sex for themselves, although it understood the concepts, and was, unlike Breq, not very good at relating to humans. More and more as the story unfolded I started developing an idea about AI behavior being patterned after or reflecting our understanding of neuroatypical thought. I can totally see the behaviors associated folks on the Asperger Spectrum reflected in these characters. I am not saying “ASD folks are like robots” or that they are inhuman. I am saying neuroatypical folks might see themselves reflected, as I did. These AIs were empathetic for me and they allowed me to see my own neuroatypicality reflected as I watched them process human relations. It seemed to me to a useful lens with which to understand my own processes.

I’m wrapping up a third book about an AI tonight (I’m still not sure if the trend here is with stuff that’s being published or just me, honestly). Autonomous: A Novel by Annalee Newitz is good, but I have some reservations about it. It follows a pharmaceutical drug pirate and biotech engineer, a woman who goes by the name Jack, as she seeks to stop an outbreak of a deadly adverse event in a reverse engineered drug she’s bootlegging. The powers that be have sent a human-AI team to track her down.

Sexuality and gender are part of the plot in this story. Jack is bisexual and that’s a non-issue, but the human detective Eliasz and his AI partner Paladin have a sexual relationship, as well. And this is where my reservations come in. Paladin is a military-grade bot, and is therefore gendered by humans as male. Eliasz has a very self-loathingly homophobic reaction to his own attraction to Paladin. When they commence an actual relationship, Eliasz ask Paladin whether he should refer to it as a he or a she. Paladin chooses “She.” I 100% support Paladin having a choice and the choice she makes, but, by making it, she allows Elisz to skip over his very serious issue with homophobia. And Paladin realizes this. So she appreciates the act of being able to consent and the fact that she is an active participant, not just a receptacle, but also thinks this is more complicated than Eliasz realizes. I agree. I’m not done with this book, should be wrapping it up tonight, so maybe I’ll feel differently in a few hours…but I don’t think so.

Also queued for me is Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer, which I am told also deals with gender in an intelligent way. It’s worth noting that Tor is really reach out to find and publish interesting books on sexuality and gender (and by women,) and so are getting a lot of my money these days. ^_^

If you’ve read anything you think people ought to know about for their winter reading, throw it out in the comments! We can all always use a good book recommendation.

 

 

12 Responses

  1. Jenny says:

    Um… I’m fairly certain you have a copy of Flowers of Luna, which would fit in this category

  2. keri says:

    I’m barely into Winterglass by Benjanun Sriduangkaew so I can’t say much about the book in general, but it’s very intriguing and only came out in the last couple weeks. It’s novella length, I think, but I have it in e-form and I have trouble judging length in digital (word-depth means more than word count sometimes!) Although now that I think of it, I’m not sure if it’s science fiction or fantasy. There’s magic, but the overall feel is nothing like a swords and sorcery.

  3. Natalie says:

    ‘More and more as the story unfolded I started developing an idea about AI behavior being patterned after or reflecting our understanding of neuroatypical thought. I can totally see the behaviors associated folks on the Asperger Spectrum reflected in these characters.’

    I haven’t read these books, and I can see where you’re going with this, but as someone with ASD and who is also gay, being compared to robots, machinery and AI makes me feel extremely uncomfortable. The idea that autistic people have no ‘theory of mind’, no empathy and that we’re just soulless robots that can’t relate to normal people is life destroying, and it makes me and others question our relationships and our choices every day. People with autism do experience empathy, just in different ways to neurotypical people.

    I’m not sure if you’re currently aware but a book written by an ‘autism parent’ has been published recently by HarperCollins – she wants to be able to get power of attorney and sterilize him when he’s 18 and believes that no person with ASD has a sound theory of mind. This is a woman that threw her son’s toy in the garbage chute because he didn’t play with it in an ‘appropriate’ way for her and HarperCollins felt this was fit to publish for an audience about autistic people.

    Why do I mention this? Because science fiction writers/publishers seem to think that it’s okay to make a comparison between robots and autistic people.

    I’m sorry if I sound too heated but I think it’s necessary. If I don’t say something, who will? And maybe someone else will find out something about autism that they didn’t know. Thanks for reading. #BoycotttoSiri

    • I had a feeling that this would be the response. In no way are the artists intending this to be the message. I I also am on the spectrum and I certainly saw some of my own neuroatypical behaviors reflected here, so of course I read this through the lens of my own experience.

      I am not saying “ASD folks are like robots.”I am saying neuroatypical folks might see themselves reflected, as I did. I’ll state that more plainly to clarify, but I expected this very response. I actually weighed whether it was worth sharing, knowing it would be read the way you read it. But I did see my neuroatypical self reflected here and I should be able to comfortable sharing that on my blog.

      • Natalie says:

        And if that’s the response you took away from reading these books then that’s perfectly fine. The community is not a hive mind and I’m sorry if I upset you with my comment – it was not my intent. It is your blog and you should be able to write what you want.

        But it was a response that was expected enough that you thought about what you were going to write. So I don’t think I’m being completely unreasonable in that regard.

        I guess not everyone will interpret these books and read them the same way that you do, and while an author may explicitly say that ‘this was not my intent’ for their story, something may still be interpreted implicitly.

        I did say that being compared to robots and machinery made me uncomfortable – it is hard being neurodiverse and having to cope with the outside world. Most people DO treat me like a robot and it’s disturbing. Or even worse, as if I’m the rudest person they have ever met. And it only gets worse if I attempt to provide an explanation or laugh off a confused stare. That’s my personal experience. For as long as I can remember.

        Thanks again, and I’m truly sorry if I offended you. It really wasn’t my intent.

        • Oh, no, you didn’t upset me at all! I just kind of expected that response from someone. I promise I wasn’t at all offended – and I return the apology, I tried to clarify to make my point more clearly. I meant no larger comparison, just that the behaviors of the AIs reminded me of some neuroatypical behaviors,including my own. Please do not think for a second that you are at fault. Your opinions and perspectives are as valid as mine. I appreciate your comments.

Leave a Reply