Mamoru Oshii’s Vlad Love, Guest Review by Megan

April 14th, 2021

Welcome to another Guest Review Wednesday on Okazu! I’m ecstatic to be welcoming back Guest Reviewer Megan who is once again here to talk to us about Mamoru Oshii’s “girl-meets-girl” anime. Please give her your best Okazu welcome. Take it away Megan!

Vlad Love, director Oshii Mamoruā€™s return to TV anime 40 years after Urusei, is now streaming in full on Crunchyroll. How did this bizarre passion project work out in the end? 

In the first review for episode 1, vampire girl Mai met blood-donation maniac girl Mitsugu, and we were also introduced to voluptuous school nurse Chihiro. In the next few episodes weā€™re introduced to Maiā€™s powers and an eclectic cast of characters interested in Mai, from cosplay club captain Kaoru who wants to dress Mai up, to killjoy student council president Jinko. The cast ends up forming a blood donation club and the rest of the series is episodic scenarios like a school play or a short film by Cinema club captain Maki. 

Vlad Love hits its stride when it combines this bunch of personalities with a suitably absurd scenario, and happily the show swings more often than it misses. The show may have been marketed as a slapstick comedy, but thereā€™s other sorts of comedy beyond just that on offer here, from acerbic wit to non-sequitur Oshii references to obscure old films and much else besides. Some of my favourite moments were when the show toned down the zaniness more than I expected, like episode 7 which seemed relatively low-key by Vlad Loveā€™s standards – until it was all recontextualised when you see the payoff – or in truth lack much of – in the short film itself. Episode 8, a joke that could have felt played out before it even got off the ground, is carried by Park Romiā€™s performance and Mizuno Utaā€™s wonderful classic shoujo-style art. 

Another highlight is episode 6ā€™s Castlevania parody, which as a longtime gaming nerd and ā€˜vania fan already seemed designed for me, but still got a lot of things right up to the questionable mechanic of hearts powering sub-weapons. Oshii and co. evidently did some research, and while there isnā€™t exactly particularly deep cuts of vampire lore here, I couldnā€™t help but smile at moments like the reveal of Mitsuguā€™s dadā€™s identity. 

The show doesnā€™t win every time though. The first half of episode 4, for example, gets oddly uncomfortable as Mitsugu is kidnapped by an all-male ā€˜torture clubā€™. Other sections, like most of episode 9, failed to land for me because, while I might have been sure a section was referencing some old Japanese or Western media or folklore or such, I didnā€™t actually know what the reference was to. This also isnā€™t a show interested in much in the way of character development – the supporting cast is essentially one-dimensional and the characters donā€™t change much over the course of the show. This isnā€™t as deep a flaw as it might otherwise be since the show is expressly a comedy, but some more development for the mains would have been welcome. 

Another instance of a lack of development is the showā€™s Yuri. As we saw in the first review, ep 1 was focused on establishing Mitsugu and Maiā€™s relationship, and ep 2 builds on this a bit further with a moonlight ā€œnight flight of loveā€ for the girls. The next few episodes mainly focus on the other club members vying for Maiā€™s attention, and by this point we might share Mitsuguā€™s frustration that everyone else is monopolising Mai. Thereā€™s finally a bit of development in the next episode, 6, as Mitsugu and Mai share a quiet moment complete with piano and a sparkly background. Mitsugu tries to confess, but Jinko intervenes before she can actually get the word Suki out. Thereā€™s some moments here and there in the remaining episodes, like Mitsugu comparing the two of them to a married couple, but no real payoff in the finale, which was disappointing. Indeed, the show overall just sort of stops after Maiā€™s backstory is finally revealed rather than coming to much of a conclusion. 

On the technical side, Vlad Love doesnā€™t have the most impressive animation compared to some other Winter 2021 anime, but this doesnā€™t matter much since the art style and animation more or less always fits the comedy in the way it needs to. Thereā€™s some nice creative direction touches and of course Mizunoā€™s lovely art from time to time. The music is fitting too, with a mix of mysterious-sounding and intense tracks, and even some piano pieces for the sad backstories and a romantic moment or two. The vocal performances are also strong across the board – as mentioned, Park Romi steals the show here, but pretty much everyone sounds good, and I liked how several of the girls had quite mature-sounding voices. 

Overall, I had a good deal of fun in my time with Vlad Love. The show didnā€™t live up to its full potential, especially in how elements like the Yuri and character development ended up feeling rather undercooked, but it does deliver on a combo of retro-style anime comedy andā€¦ well, whatever random references Oshii wanted to put in there. As an anime fan for some years now itā€™s very rare to see an anime that feels quite as much of a passion project, designed without much care to current conventions or what a production committee would find marketable. For this reason as well as the show itself being a good time, despite the flaws I can recommend giving it a go if you donā€™t find the style of comedy a turnoff. 

Ratings:

Art – 8, not technically impressive but fits the comedy very well. 

Story/Characters – 7, episodic comedy so not much ā€˜plotā€™ to speak of, situations and characters are mostly fun, but a few setups that donā€™t work as well and cast remains quite one-dimensional

Service – 7, quite a bit (Chihiroā€™s character design is worth a few points alone) but mostly stays on the side of light-hearted rather than leery. 

Yuri – 4, itā€™s there but only in scattered moments beyond the first two episodes

Overall – 7 

As a bonus for reading to the end – hereā€™s a mini-review of Vlad Loveā€™s series guidebook! Itā€™s quite a bulky volume (the Ikuhara anime guidebooks I own, for example, are usually under 200 pages), but the size is justified by its comprehensiveness – it has just about everything, from key visuals and character designs to key animation and storyboards, galleries of Mizunoā€™s art to staff interviews at the back. Thereā€™s not much particularly revelatory here, though I was amused to find the Chihiro shots covered up by ā€œself censorshipā€ were, in their original form, wellā€¦ the book is a solid pickup for fans of the show or people interested in the animation process. 

You can find me here on Okazuā€™s comment section, and my twitter account @AnimeSocMegan. As always, thank you very much for reading and hereā€™s ā€˜till next time! 

Erica here: Thank you again Megan! I can’t help but notice that the end of episode one was subtly changed in fact to lower the Yuri level, for the CR version. I don’t think he had the interest in going through with it, only to tease it a bit, like so many of the older directors used to.
In my opinion this series suffered from no clear idea at all, really. It was awfully like a story idea thought up over a few beers and then they got some money and had to do something. My feelings about the series are summarized in this movie clip. “He’s a genius.
But I’ll give it this – I watched all of it. ^_^

6 Responses

  1. CW says:

    “Other sections, like most of episode 9, failed to land for me because, while I might have been sure a section was referencing some old Japanese or Western media or folklore or such, I didnā€™t actually know what the reference was to.”

    The episode is a homage to the 1960s work of mangaka Yoshiharu Tsuge, especially Neji-shiki.

    • Megan says:

      Oh, Tsuge is namechecked right at the end of episode 9 so I did eventually find out what all the homages were to. But I must admit even when Oshii specified the things, Japanese or Western, he was referencing most of the time I’d never heard of them or in the other cases for films like Casablanca or Gone with the Wind I’ve never watched them ^^;

  2. This was a fantastic review and makes me want to check out some episodes; it almost sounds like an anachronism in some ways, so I’m interested to see it keeping your review in mind. Cheers!

    • Megan says:

      Thankyou and I’m glad you enjoyed the review, Christian. ^_^ Even more than most shows I feel this is one where where I’d recommend for people to give it 2-3 episodes and see how they like it. Hard to predict whether someone might bounce straight off it or instead find a new favourite!

  3. CW says:

    The background to this anime is that Oshii worked on an episodic VN called ć”ć¾ćæć‚Œćƒžć‚¤ćƒ»ć‚‰ć¶, released on iOS in 2013, and essentially that’s the basis for Vlad Love. Mitsugu’s equivalent in the game, the player character, was apparently a nameless boy though.

    But it wasn’t the only attempt at doing the concept again… Oshii also directed a live action film version called č”€ćƒćØ悂恠恔. It had a preview screening in 2019, but its proper release was indefinitely postponed due to the personal life of one of the young women in it being treated as a scandal. But there was a making of documentary building hype for it that can be found under the title ēµ¶åƾē›£ē£äø»ē¾© ļ½žć‚·ćƒćƒžćƒ©ćƒœ ęŠ¼äŗ•å®ˆćŸć”ć®ęŒ‘ęˆ¦ļ½ž. I suspect the business case for the anime would have been predicated on the film’s release.

Leave a Reply